Around the world, many countries are resorting to extreme methods such as mandates and coerced and even forced vaccinations, with little success in stopping the spread of the coronavirus. Some countries are reversing track with certain vaccines after the appearance of adverse side effects.
Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway have recently suspended use of a new coronavirus vaccine.
The Swedish Public Health Agency recommended on October 6 that the use of Moderna’s new Covid-19 vaccine for young people should be temporarily stopped, citing concerns about rare cardiac side effects. It stated that the suspension should initially last until December 1st, and explained that it has received evidence of increased risk of side effects, such as enteritis( inflammation of the small intestine) and pericarditis(an inflammation of the heart condition).
Finland joined with Sweden, Denmark and Norway on October 7, to advise against using Modena’s new vaccine among young people on the grounds that they believe that measures need to be taken to prevent rare cardiovascular side effects.
The Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare said that it will suspend the use of Modena’s vaccine in males under the age of 30 following similar measures taken by the Swedish regulator on October 6. Denmark said that as a precautionary measure, it would not provide Modena to persons under the age of 18.
Norway has recommended that all people under the age of 18 should not be vaccinated with Moderna’s vaccine, even if they have already received one dose, and recommended that men under the age of 30 consider getting the vaccine developed by Pfizer. Norwegian officials cited data from the United States, Canada and Northern Europe, saying that the absolute risk is small, calling the recommendation a “probabilistic preventive measure.”
The European Medicines Agency said that new preliminary data from the Nordic countries support the agency’s warning passed in July, that after vaccination with the new vaccines produced by Modena and Pfizer, Inflammatory heart disease of myocarditis and pericarditis may occur in very rare cases.
However, so far, the absolute leader in dealing with the coronavirus among foreign countries is Japan. Cases are significantly down over the last few months.
Let’s consider the timeline:
In September, the deaths caused by vaccination were being investigated.
At about that time, new vaccine bottles were being inspected and a metallic “magnetic” material was found in it.
Soon thereafter, a chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association announced that doctors should prescribe ivermectin.
A month later, Western media was shocked that coronavirus cases had almost disappeared from the island.
Haruo Ozaki, chairman of the Tokyo Medical Association,was criticized by many peers throughout the medical community for recommending the use of ivermectin as a treatment for coronavirus patients at Feb. 9 press conference.
Why are many media reporting that ivermectin is not a viable solution given the example of Japan’s recent success in dealing with the pandemic. Surely, this success would warrant more attention and research in the direction of finding a cure. But, to the contrary, many countries are quick to dismiss the possibility that it might have had any positive effect.
In fact, it is hard to find any specific data on how many people have taken ivermectin in Japan, the Tokyo Medical Association does not make official government policy, and it’s hard to find any evidence the suggestion was acted upon.
Why is this type of information being discredited and suppressed?
Given the statistics of around 70% of Japan’s population being vaccinated, other countries with similar vaccination statistic numbers have not seen the same favorable results.
This is the situation in a country that still has the rule of law. The government responded to deaths and contaminated vaccines, doctors are searching for alternative methods for treatment, people got better, and the virus has almost disappeared.
Now compare it with what happened in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. All three countries have suffered terrible failures in dealing with the new variants of coronavirus, and this failure has led to the loss of freedom and destruction of commerce.
Governments have been a force to help fight the virus to some extent, but in fact many governments choose to become accomplices of the big consortium that controls the lifeline of the world economy in order to maintain their own money and power.
Japan has set a historical precedent for governments to do the right thing and win.
If the government does not do this, it is because it compromises with the shadow government of the evil consortium behind it, and compromises to maintain its own money and power status while betraying its conscience.
However, in order to maximize their rights and interests, the evil forces control people and also eliminate the government. The ultimate goal is to establish a world government governed by their own high degree of power, and treat all people as animals.
In other words, the government’s compromise to evil ultimately amounts to self-destruction. This is also the ending of betraying the soul to Satan. God’s eyes are like electricity. In this tumultuous world, God is choosing a life with a conscience to enter the future.